The fourthÂ book in my DIY MFA is Zora Neale Hurston’sÂ Their Eyes Were Watching God.Â The book wasn’t received well when it was published, so IÂ didn’t know what to expect from myÂ reading. I can only say now that I loved reading this book, and loved seeing the world through Janie’s eyes.Â This book and its characters have fastened themselves to my mind. In this post, I’ve chosen to discuss three of the many aspects that beg exploration: the beginning of the book, Janie’s character arc, and Hurston’s beautiful language. As I examineÂ these aspects of the classic novel, I’m always thinking about how to apply what I’m learning to my current work-in-progress, and to my writing in general.
Hurston creates profound sympathy for Janie from the first page.Â The story begins as JanieÂ Â walks a gauntlet of prying, gossiping neighbors. Out loud, they talk gleefully about how she’s fallen in the world. “She ain’t even worth talking after,” one neighbor says, as they continue to discuss nothing else. “She sits high, but she looks low.” Janie earns the reader’sÂ sympathy by enduring her neighbor’s stinging hostility; she more than endures.Â She walks by without withering, without stopping to solicit the neighbors’ good opinions. She sails by, with the grace and confidence of a woman who deserves admiration, but doesn’t need it. In just a few short paragraphs, Hurston tells us much about this character, and also allies us readers with her.
Getting readers to be on the main character’s side is something that Cheryl Klein has talked about in her book Second SightÂ (and also in this post on her blog). Klein says the author can make aÂ character sympathetic by showing unlikable characters mistreating him or her. Klein discusses this strategy via Harry Potter (as is her way). She writes, “What happens is basic literary math: We dislike the Dursleys, and the Dursleys dislike Harry, so we automatically like Harry.” Janie couldn’t be more different from Harry Potter, but the same strategy works in both cases. If it can work in these two texts, it can certainly work in mine.
Hurston seeds the introductory pages with elementsÂ that pulled me instantly into the story. There is, as I’ve said, the friction with the neighbors. We also learn almost immediately that there has been a death, but don’t yet know who has passed away. Then, we hear about a man named Tea Cake, and we knowÂ only that he’s younger than Janie, that the neighbors didn’t approve of him, and that theyÂ assume that he has been an instrument of her downfall. Death, envy, and sex – what could be more titillating?
Janie’s arc from a person who lives according to society’s values to someone who lives by her ownÂ is a compelling and beautiful one. It’s not only that Janie has an unconventional love affair, or that she finds her voice. It’s what she says, it’s that she learns to say what is in her heart. For example, when Tea Cake asks her whether she regretsÂ leavingÂ her secure and affluent life to be with him, Janie says, “If you kin see the light at daybreak, you don’t keer if you die at dusk. It’s so many people never seen de light at all. Ah wuz fumblin’ round and God opened de door.” Earlier in the story, Janie resigns herself to a separateness of her outer and inner worlds. Such an emotional speech is only possible for her later in her life, when she feels whole.
Their Eyes Were Watching God is a coming of middle-age story. There are many stories like this, aboutÂ the older and wiser woman who, after spending her youth doing what society expects, sloughs of externalÂ obligations and begins to live for herself. I, an almostÂ middle-aged white woman in the Pacific Northwest, relate deeply to Janie’s journey, though we share little else in common.
The beauty of this book is its language. Hurston writes withÂ two distinct styles: the narrative voice and the dialogue. Both are rich with rhythm and metaphor. The narrative voice contains some of the Southern vernacular, but it’s in the dialogue that the characters and setting come to life. HurstonÂ uses open vowels and dropped consonants, writing phonetically to make the dialect accessible to readers. Even though I’m not familiar with the dialect at all, within a few pages I felt at home in it.
Here’s an example that shows both narrative voice and dialogue. In this scene, Janie and her second husband Joe are having one of the fights that erodes theirÂ affection.
“You sho love to tell me whut to do, but Ah can’t tell you nothin’ Ah see!”
“Dat’s ’cause you need telling’,” he rejoined hotly. “It would be pitiful if Ah didn’t. Somebody got to think for women and chillun and cows. I god, they show don’t think for theirselves.”
“Ah knows uh few things, and womenfolks thinks sometimes too!”
“Aw naw they don’t. They just think they’s thinkin’. When Ah see one thing Ah understands ten. You see ten things and don’t understand one.”
Time and scenes like that put Janie to thinking about the inside state of her marriage. Time came when she fought back with her tongue as best she could, but it didn’t do her any good. It just made Joe do more. He wanted her submission and he’d keep on fighting until he felt he had it.
So gradually, she pressed her teeth together and learned to hush. The spirit of the marriage left her bedroom and took to living in the parlor. It was there to shake hands whenever company came to visit, but it never went back inside the bedroom again.
– Zora Neale Hurston, Their Eyes Â Were Watching God
In a recentÂ SCBWIÂ workshop on dialogue, Lin Oliver advised writers only to attempt regional dialogue if theyÂ really know it and can comfortably keep it going throughout the whole book.Â Hurston writes the dialect precisely and consistently; it’s the tongue of her childhood.
My current work-in-progress Nana’s BikiniÂ hasÂ several characters who speak with a heavy Italian accent. I’m struggling with consistency, and with how to conveyÂ their accents at all. Oliver’s advice is to indicate the dialect with key words or phrases, rather than try to carry the dialect through to the end. I’ll have to go back to my manuscript, and think carefully about how to do this. What could the key words be? What is the best way to write the Italian accent phonetically? Once I decide these answers, I have to make sure I carry that through from beginning to end.
This book was a gift to me as a writer and a reader, and I’m grateful for my DIY MFA for prompting me to read it. Thank goodness, too, for Alice Walker, considered by many to be responsible for rekindling interest in Hurston. In 1975, Walker wrote an article for MS. Magazine called “Looking for Zora” about her trip to Hurston’s final hometown to find her burial site and to speak with those who knew her. It’s a wonderful read about Alice Walker paying tribute to her hero, her adopted ancestor.
To read previous entries in my DIY MFA series: